Sermon: Seeing Sin - April 23,
2006
John 9
(Read verses 1-7)
How amazing it is that some people are
able to see sin lurking behind every tree and under every rock!
There it is! Here it comes! Surely that is it!
The disciples and Jesus are just walking
along when they see a man who is blind—blind from birth. The
disciples begin to ask, “Why has this blindness befallen him
Jesus? What has caused it; his sin or his parents sin?”
Friends, if he has been blind from birth are the disciples
suggesting that he possibly sinned in the womb? What is a womb sin
anyway? Of course if you see sin behind every tree and under every
rock you will certainly see it in the womb! When the disciples look
at the blind man they see sin.
Well, Jesus informs them that neither he
nor his parents sinned; that his blindness has nothing to do with
sin! Raymond Brown, a New Testament scholar, has written, “Jesus
was asked about the cause of the man’s blindness but he answers in
terms of its purpose.”[1]
And according to Jesus the purpose is that God will be
revealed through the man. Jesus then talks about being light and
bringing light into the world; as the eye brings light into the
body.
Jesus then proceeds to spit onto the
ground and then to knead his spit with the dirt making a mud pack.
He then places it on the blind man’s eyes. Now take note, the blind
man has said nothing! He did not ask for a healing. All he knows
is that this stranger is putting a wet substance on his eyes and
telling him to go wash it off. He does. And he sees!
John then records that the blind man’s
neighbors begin to question him as to what has occurred. They are
even uncertain as to whether it is really him who now sees or if it
is someone who looks like him. The neighbors then decide to take
him to the religious leaders to get their opinion on the matter.
Mistake! (Read verses 13-17)
Now notice—the Pharisees, the religious
leaders, like Jesus’ disciples are good at seeing sin. They see it
in Jesus! “This one is not from God because he does not observe
the Sabbath!” Jesus broke a Sabbath regulation, which was a
terrible sin. What did Jesus do that was so bad? He worked on the
Sabbath! Remember? He mixed or kneaded the dirt with his spit—that
was work! So he sinned! And as the Pharisees said, “How can a
person who is a sinner perform miracles?”
Since the Pharisees are not convinced of
the man’s story, that he was ever blind, that this is all a hoax,
they call his parents in to question them. The parents confirm that
he was born blind; yet, they know nothing about his healing! So the
Pharisees once again question the man who was formerly blind.
(Read verses 24-34)
These religious leaders will not
give up. They do change the direction of their argument but they
will not give up. They are now convinced that the man had been
blind but they insist that Jesus, the horrible Sabbath-breaking
sinner, not be recognized as an instrument of the healing.
The formerly blind man is getting a bit
irritated with these religious folk. He tells them that he has no
explanation for his healing. “All I know,” he says, “is
that prior to my experience with Jesus I was blind and now I see!”
Further, he asks the Pharisees, since they seem so interested in
Jesus, if they want to become his disciples. At this suggestion the
Pharisees nearly go into seizure! “How dare you say something
like that to us? We follow the law! We know what is right! And we
do not know about this Jesus!” The man who was formerly blind
just cannot remain quiet; he turns the religious leaders theological
argument back onto them. “Well,” he says, “this is
astonishing! You do not know Jesus; yet, you say that God does not
listen to sinners and you say Jesus is a sinner yet Jesus opened my
eyes. If he were not from God he then could not have done this!”
At this point the Pharisees completely
lose it! They say to the man, “You were born entirely in sin and
you are trying to teach us?” Like Jesus’ disciples the religious
leaders see sin in the man’s blindness. Friends, leave it to the
religious leaders—they see sin everywhere except in themselves!
Listen now as I read the final scene from
today’s story. (Read verses 35-41)
What a strange mission Jesus has!
“I came into this world…so that those who do not see may see, and
those who do see may become blind.” When the Pharisees hear
Jesus make this comment they say to him, to this one they consider
to be a sinner, “Surely you do not think that we are blind!”
Jesus says to them, “If you were blind, you would not have sin.
But now that you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.”
Friends, there is nothing any more
dangerous than people who presume that they already see,[2]
who presume that they know everything. Especially when these
seeing people are so good at seeing the sin, the problems, the
mistakes, in everyone else while missing their own sin, mistakes,
and problems. This reminds me of Jesus’ words in the Sermon on the
Mount. “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged…Why do you
see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the log in
your own eye?”[3]
Jesus’ disciples saw sin in the man born
blind. The Pharisees also saw sin in the man, as well as in Jesus.
And Jesus, he saw the man! The first verse of today’s text reads, “As
Jesus walked along, he saw a man blind from birth.”
Jesus saw the man! Jesus came to bring sight, spiritual sight, to
those who recognize a need for it. The Pharisees did not recognize
their need because they were too busy recognizing, seeing, the sin
in others.
So? We have a choice to make. Are we
going to choose to see as the Pharisees see or are we going to
choose to see as Jesus sees? Are we going to see the sin in others
or are we going to see others? Are we going to see the fault of
others and judge them for their faults or are we going to see the
need that others have and help to meet their need—as did Jesus with
the blind man? Are we open to the spiritual sight that Jesus offers
or do we prefer the blindness of thinking we already see and really
need no correction?
Seeing sin or seeing people—it is our
choice to make!
[1] Raymond Brown, The Gospel According
to John.
[2] Richard Rohr, Everything Belongs,
Page 31.
|